<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is not a Roadmap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Aguiar</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Aguiar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>Great News!  I can&#039;t wait to see all the new improvements to Things in the future.  Keep up the good work gentlemen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great News!  I can&#8217;t wait to see all the new improvements to Things in the future.  Keep up the good work gentlemen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jürgen</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jürgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>@Mike: People support for Things on the iPhone means all features related to people and delegation the desktop version already has plus those we will add in the meantime.

@Richard Neal: We will indeed add an importer for one specific other GTD app. But since we are having AppleScript support, everyone can write their own importer. Take a look here for some examples (maybe what you are looking for is already there):

&lt;a href=&quot;http://culturedcode.com/things/wiki/index.php/User_Contributed_Scripts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;User Contributed Scripts&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike: People support for Things on the iPhone means all features related to people and delegation the desktop version already has plus those we will add in the meantime.</p>
<p>@Richard Neal: We will indeed add an importer for one specific other GTD app. But since we are having AppleScript support, everyone can write their own importer. Take a look here for some examples (maybe what you are looking for is already there):</p>
<p><a href="http://culturedcode.com/things/wiki/index.php/User_Contributed_Scripts" rel="nofollow">User Contributed Scripts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazer</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>Sweeeeet news !!

I&#039;ve tried and tested others , but THINGS beats it hands down by the sheer fact that its simple and usable.

WIth over the air Sync , its should be the tipping point where this product is going to go thru the roof.

Thanks again for making &quot;Things&quot; better for us all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweeeeet news !!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried and tested others , but THINGS beats it hands down by the sheer fact that its simple and usable.</p>
<p>WIth over the air Sync , its should be the tipping point where this product is going to go thru the roof.</p>
<p>Thanks again for making &#8220;Things&#8221; better for us all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>I own Things, Things Touch, and another popular GTD application for the desktop and iPhone. I wanted Things to work for me because I prefer how it looks. But I switched because I needed the peace of mind that syncing would be flawless — which it has been. I’ll keep checking back and trying the updates to see how your progress is coming along. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own Things, Things Touch, and another popular GTD application for the desktop and iPhone. I wanted Things to work for me because I prefer how it looks. But I switched because I needed the peace of mind that syncing would be flawless — which it has been. I’ll keep checking back and trying the updates to see how your progress is coming along. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3188</guid>
		<description>I’ve got to agree with Hamish, Marquies and Lew that a solution is needed to create and edit tasks on a PC. Rather than a separate PC version, I would suggest that the best solution would be a web app which would sync with the Mac, PC’s and my iPhone. There are free to-do apps that offer this ability now. Of course as task management apps go they pale in comparison to Things. The ability to create and edit lists from anywhere is a compelling feature and one I would love to see made available to Things customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve got to agree with Hamish, Marquies and Lew that a solution is needed to create and edit tasks on a PC. Rather than a separate PC version, I would suggest that the best solution would be a web app which would sync with the Mac, PC’s and my iPhone. There are free to-do apps that offer this ability now. Of course as task management apps go they pale in comparison to Things. The ability to create and edit lists from anywhere is a compelling feature and one I would love to see made available to Things customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3187</guid>
		<description>Stephen &quot;I only have one request I haven’t seen mentioned: the ability to filter by tags and see only ‘next’ actions. In other words, when I filter by a tag (e.g. ‘home’), I currently see all tasks which have that tag including those which are not really ‘available’ because they are number 2 or 3 in a project. For example, let’s say I have a project to clean the steps. First item is to go buy some soap and a brush, second is to do the cleaning at home. I can’t do the cleaning until I complete action 1 (the errand); but when I select the tag ‘home’ to see what tasks I can do at home, it comes up telling me to ‘clean the steps’. This isn’t a huge deal because of course I can mentally filter that out, but I’ve always thought it would be nice to select a tag and just see ‘next’ actions, i.e. the next available actions rather than actions which are further down the list of a project. In other words, to use tags to quickly see which things I can do right now in a particular context.!&quot;

I would love this as well, and it would make sense since &quot;Next&quot; should show the &quot;next&quot; actions.

Other than that keep it up guys Things is a wonderful product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen &#8220;I only have one request I haven’t seen mentioned: the ability to filter by tags and see only ‘next’ actions. In other words, when I filter by a tag (e.g. ‘home’), I currently see all tasks which have that tag including those which are not really ‘available’ because they are number 2 or 3 in a project. For example, let’s say I have a project to clean the steps. First item is to go buy some soap and a brush, second is to do the cleaning at home. I can’t do the cleaning until I complete action 1 (the errand); but when I select the tag ‘home’ to see what tasks I can do at home, it comes up telling me to ‘clean the steps’. This isn’t a huge deal because of course I can mentally filter that out, but I’ve always thought it would be nice to select a tag and just see ‘next’ actions, i.e. the next available actions rather than actions which are further down the list of a project. In other words, to use tags to quickly see which things I can do right now in a particular context.!&#8221;</p>
<p>I would love this as well, and it would make sense since &#8220;Next&#8221; should show the &#8220;next&#8221; actions.</p>
<p>Other than that keep it up guys Things is a wonderful product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your excellent work on these improvements. I’ve hardly ever had cause to regret switching to Things from a competing product, and it’s great to know that the few lingering advantages of that product (over the air sync, for example) will be eliminated in coming releases. Even more importantly, I’m confident your solutions will be much more elegant and efficient (OTA sync to the iPhone is too slow in other applications, even though it works). Push notifications will be a big deal (another thing which your competitors recently took a stab at and came up short).

I only have one request I haven’t seen mentioned: the ability to filter by tags and see only ‘next’ actions. In other words, when I filter by a tag (e.g. ‘home’), I currently see all tasks which have that tag including those which are not really ‘available’ because they are number 2 or 3 in a project. For example, let’s say I have a project to clean the steps. First item is to go buy some soap and a brush, second is to do the cleaning at home. I can’t do the cleaning until I complete action 1 (the errand); but when I select the tag ‘home’ to see what tasks I can do at home, it comes up telling me to ‘clean the steps’. This isn’t a huge deal because of course I can mentally filter that out, but I’ve always thought it would be nice to select a tag and just see ‘next’ actions, i.e. the next available actions rather than actions which are further down the list of a project. In other words, to use tags to quickly see which things I can do right now in a particular context. I’m not sure how feasible that is from a development point of view, and of course adding complexity is the last thing we want (simplicity, speed and elegance are still the biggest joys of Things, compared with competing products), so it’s just a thought rather than a real issue, but there you have it. Keep up the excellent work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your excellent work on these improvements. I’ve hardly ever had cause to regret switching to Things from a competing product, and it’s great to know that the few lingering advantages of that product (over the air sync, for example) will be eliminated in coming releases. Even more importantly, I’m confident your solutions will be much more elegant and efficient (OTA sync to the iPhone is too slow in other applications, even though it works). Push notifications will be a big deal (another thing which your competitors recently took a stab at and came up short).</p>
<p>I only have one request I haven’t seen mentioned: the ability to filter by tags and see only ‘next’ actions. In other words, when I filter by a tag (e.g. ‘home’), I currently see all tasks which have that tag including those which are not really ‘available’ because they are number 2 or 3 in a project. For example, let’s say I have a project to clean the steps. First item is to go buy some soap and a brush, second is to do the cleaning at home. I can’t do the cleaning until I complete action 1 (the errand); but when I select the tag ‘home’ to see what tasks I can do at home, it comes up telling me to ‘clean the steps’. This isn’t a huge deal because of course I can mentally filter that out, but I’ve always thought it would be nice to select a tag and just see ‘next’ actions, i.e. the next available actions rather than actions which are further down the list of a project. In other words, to use tags to quickly see which things I can do right now in a particular context. I’m not sure how feasible that is from a development point of view, and of course adding complexity is the last thing we want (simplicity, speed and elegance are still the biggest joys of Things, compared with competing products), so it’s just a thought rather than a real issue, but there you have it. Keep up the excellent work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lew</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to say that I love Things for Mac. In regards to the original blog post and the responses to it I&#039;d like to cast my vote on a few issues too.

Nested tasks are indeed dangerous, the power of things comes from its simplicity. Mile stones or a list of task-break-downs would be a much more safe option. For example, if I had a task of calling all of my customers I would first have to decide between making one task &quot;call all customers&quot; or create a separate task for each customers call &quot;Call customer 1, call customer 2, call customer n&quot;. If each call had its own set of information such as &quot;Call Fred Smith on Tuesday and follow up on Widget order&quot; then each call would obviously warrant a dedicated task. If however, my task is as generic as &quot;Call all customers and tell them about our new promotion&quot; then it would be great to have a single task which contained a list of customers that I could check-off as I contact them. Note that these are not full tasks with my main task as a parent. They don&#039;t have all the attributes of a task, they can&#039;t stand on their own. They are just items on a very simple list which can be checked off one at a time.

Things touch works great for viewing and checking off tasks. And for tasks as simple as &quot;Buy bread&quot; it&#039;s easy enough to create tasks on-the-go. My problem come when I&#039;m at work, where I have my iPhone and my PC, but not my Mac. The tasks I create while at work are too verbose and detailed to use the TT interface. Though the iPhone has a great keyboard and TT has a fantastic interface it takes too much effort to enter these complicated tasks. As a result my tasks usually end up on the PC where I can typing using a real keyboard. It would be nice if there was a web-app that could be used in combination with OTA sync to do task creation. In short, I don&#039;t need Things to run on a PC, but a webapp I could use to do data entry and then sync OTA would mean I can fully use Things even when I&#039;m not at home with my Mac.


Thanks for the great apps and keep up the good work.

Cheers,
Lew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to say that I love Things for Mac. In regards to the original blog post and the responses to it I&#8217;d like to cast my vote on a few issues too.</p>
<p>Nested tasks are indeed dangerous, the power of things comes from its simplicity. Mile stones or a list of task-break-downs would be a much more safe option. For example, if I had a task of calling all of my customers I would first have to decide between making one task &#8220;call all customers&#8221; or create a separate task for each customers call &#8220;Call customer 1, call customer 2, call customer n&#8221;. If each call had its own set of information such as &#8220;Call Fred Smith on Tuesday and follow up on Widget order&#8221; then each call would obviously warrant a dedicated task. If however, my task is as generic as &#8220;Call all customers and tell them about our new promotion&#8221; then it would be great to have a single task which contained a list of customers that I could check-off as I contact them. Note that these are not full tasks with my main task as a parent. They don&#8217;t have all the attributes of a task, they can&#8217;t stand on their own. They are just items on a very simple list which can be checked off one at a time.</p>
<p>Things touch works great for viewing and checking off tasks. And for tasks as simple as &#8220;Buy bread&#8221; it&#8217;s easy enough to create tasks on-the-go. My problem come when I&#8217;m at work, where I have my iPhone and my PC, but not my Mac. The tasks I create while at work are too verbose and detailed to use the TT interface. Though the iPhone has a great keyboard and TT has a fantastic interface it takes too much effort to enter these complicated tasks. As a result my tasks usually end up on the PC where I can typing using a real keyboard. It would be nice if there was a web-app that could be used in combination with OTA sync to do task creation. In short, I don&#8217;t need Things to run on a PC, but a webapp I could use to do data entry and then sync OTA would mean I can fully use Things even when I&#8217;m not at home with my Mac.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great apps and keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Lew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marquies</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3180</link>
		<dc:creator>marquies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3180</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the timeline. The goals look good for me, but I miss one thing: Windows/Web support. I work with three OS Systems (iphone, win and mac) and I miss a usefull solution to add tasks on windows. What about sync with RTM or build an onwn web interface? (or other solution ;) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the timeline. The goals look good for me, but I miss one thing: Windows/Web support. I work with three OS Systems (iphone, win and mac) and I miss a usefull solution to add tasks on windows. What about sync with RTM or build an onwn web interface? (or other solution ;) )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geddesign</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2009/08/this-is-not-a-roadmap.html/comment-page-2#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>Geddesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/?p=228#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>I agree about keeping it simple, but argue that simplicity is not a lack of features, but rather the perception of a simple, easy to use, self-evident User Interface. So far, CC has done excellent on this front, so I welcome any and all powerful features they can add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about keeping it simple, but argue that simplicity is not a lack of features, but rather the perception of a simple, easy to use, self-evident User Interface. So far, CC has done excellent on this front, so I welcome any and all powerful features they can add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
