<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The highest form of flattery?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://culturedcode.com/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html</link>
	<description>We make Things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jürgen</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jürgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-594</guid>
		<description>You guys have been amazing! Let me give a litte background to explain.

We contacted the plagiator a few days before we posted this article. We politely explained the situation and asked him to switch back to the former design, which we knew was still around (it could be accessed at test.(his domain).com). We didn&#039;t get a response.

Apparently some readers began writing messages to the plagiator. We never intended for this to happen. But for all we know these messages seemed to have been polite enough, which we appreciate greatly.

Then after Oliver posted his experience (see his comment above), we also received an email. Quote: &quot;We actually just used a wordpress theme, and obviously it is based off of your site... it will take me a couple of weeks to find someone else to redesign and relaunch.&quot;

I assume that readers kept sending messages to the plagiator. Yesterday, after we asked him where he found the &quot;wordpress theme&quot;, he told us that it was actually created by his designer. He also told us that he changed the design back to the former one. Quote: &quot;... we are going back to v2. Sorry once again about this. I&#039;ll make sure my developers are of a higher moral quality before hiring to do a project.&quot;

Thanks guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys have been amazing! Let me give a litte background to explain.</p>
<p>We contacted the plagiator a few days before we posted this article. We politely explained the situation and asked him to switch back to the former design, which we knew was still around (it could be accessed at test.(his domain).com). We didn&#8217;t get a response.</p>
<p>Apparently some readers began writing messages to the plagiator. We never intended for this to happen. But for all we know these messages seemed to have been polite enough, which we appreciate greatly.</p>
<p>Then after Oliver posted his experience (see his comment above), we also received an email. Quote: &#8220;We actually just used a wordpress theme, and obviously it is based off of your site&#8230; it will take me a couple of weeks to find someone else to redesign and relaunch.&#8221;</p>
<p>I assume that readers kept sending messages to the plagiator. Yesterday, after we asked him where he found the &#8220;wordpress theme&#8221;, he told us that it was actually created by his designer. He also told us that he changed the design back to the former one. Quote: &#8220;&#8230; we are going back to v2. Sorry once again about this. I&#8217;ll make sure my developers are of a higher moral quality before hiring to do a project.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAnfredF</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>MAnfredF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

I might come across totally strange, but ... :
You are doing a very good job, you could just try to be proud of having people creating a copy cat. Just keep your focus on improving your outstanding work. To think (write and care) about those copy-cats gives you the wrong focus and you might waste your time. Even worse you help them to gain popularity. 

BTW: I understand your frustration.

Cheers, MAnfred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>I might come across totally strange, but &#8230; :<br />
You are doing a very good job, you could just try to be proud of having people creating a copy cat. Just keep your focus on improving your outstanding work. To think (write and care) about those copy-cats gives you the wrong focus and you might waste your time. Even worse you help them to gain popularity. </p>
<p>BTW: I understand your frustration.</p>
<p>Cheers, MAnfred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-587</guid>
		<description>the site is actually running on wordpress. i&#039;m sure their &quot;designer&quot; really created a wordpress theme based on the CC site.

now whether that &quot;designer&quot; is anyone other than the frunderful owner/proprietor/chief architect of the company is open to debate :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the site is actually running on wordpress. i&#8217;m sure their &#8220;designer&#8221; really created a wordpress theme based on the CC site.</p>
<p>now whether that &#8220;designer&#8221; is anyone other than the frunderful owner/proprietor/chief architect of the company is open to debate :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-586</guid>
		<description>Funny things happen when you find the former rip-off web site and click &quot;contact&quot; in the footer. There  it is again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny things happen when you find the former rip-off web site and click &#8220;contact&#8221; in the footer. There  it is again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Nolin</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Nolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-585</guid>
		<description>(Serves me right for paying attention to a troll...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Serves me right for paying attention to a troll&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vramin</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Vramin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Ian Beck: A wget might get the rendered HTML pages and CSS, possibly even JavaScript, but I generally don&#039;t see that as &quot;source code&quot; (I&#039;m assuming that the site runs on Rails or PHP, haven&#039;t looked to see which).

So they stole the styles and graphics, but not the source. Still stinks, but it&#039;s not like they broke into the server or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Beck: A wget might get the rendered HTML pages and CSS, possibly even JavaScript, but I generally don&#8217;t see that as &#8220;source code&#8221; (I&#8217;m assuming that the site runs on Rails or PHP, haven&#8217;t looked to see which).</p>
<p>So they stole the styles and graphics, but not the source. Still stinks, but it&#8217;s not like they broke into the server or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possible Future Things User</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Possible Future Things User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Hey Bob Nolin - I don&#039;t know where you were looking, but last time I checked, disappointment does not equal rant. It&#039;s called opinion. Helps the world go round. There would be no good products if everyone was an ass-kisser rather than being honest.

And while I&#039;m fine if your sarcastic presumption of &quot;I&#039;m sure CC is really worried&quot; is correct, I&#039;ll bet it&#039;s not if CC is even half of a business person. 

Fact is, I like what I see w/ Things so far, but for me, other progs currently do better. I&#039;m eagerly awaiting one that will bolt ahead, which is why I&#039;m waiting for Things news. The main beef I have is that if there&#039;s time for a lengthy update about somebody poaching the website, there&#039;s time for even a small update about Things since it&#039;s the &quot;Things Blog&quot;, not necessarily the &quot;Cultured Code Blog&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bob Nolin &#8211; I don&#8217;t know where you were looking, but last time I checked, disappointment does not equal rant. It&#8217;s called opinion. Helps the world go round. There would be no good products if everyone was an ass-kisser rather than being honest.</p>
<p>And while I&#8217;m fine if your sarcastic presumption of &#8220;I&#8217;m sure CC is really worried&#8221; is correct, I&#8217;ll bet it&#8217;s not if CC is even half of a business person. </p>
<p>Fact is, I like what I see w/ Things so far, but for me, other progs currently do better. I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting one that will bolt ahead, which is why I&#8217;m waiting for Things news. The main beef I have is that if there&#8217;s time for a lengthy update about somebody poaching the website, there&#8217;s time for even a small update about Things since it&#8217;s the &#8220;Things Blog&#8221;, not necessarily the &#8220;Cultured Code Blog&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlyse Comte</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlyse Comte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-582</guid>
		<description>ahh, @Possible Future Things User - I&#039;m using Things full blast already since many months, so could you, even if not perfect yet - when will anything on this planet be? - it has replaced all my other GTD applications with huge bravura.

This rip-off - hats off to being able to see some kind of humor in it. It&#039;s flattery, yeah, but... - definitely had one laughter after the other in regards to their stupidity, especially about not renaming a thing, keeping the same colors PLUS a full link. LOL... - and yeah, push responsibility off to &#039;your designer&#039;, haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahh, @Possible Future Things User &#8211; I&#8217;m using Things full blast already since many months, so could you, even if not perfect yet &#8211; when will anything on this planet be? &#8211; it has replaced all my other GTD applications with huge bravura.</p>
<p>This rip-off &#8211; hats off to being able to see some kind of humor in it. It&#8217;s flattery, yeah, but&#8230; &#8211; definitely had one laughter after the other in regards to their stupidity, especially about not renaming a thing, keeping the same colors PLUS a full link. LOL&#8230; &#8211; and yeah, push responsibility off to &#8216;your designer&#8217;, haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Nolin</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Nolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-581</guid>
		<description>They seem to have taken it down. Perhaps they have seen the error of their ways. 

@Possible Future Things User: I&#039;m sure CC is really worried you might go elsewhere. Throwing a tantrum is definitely a good way to motivate a software developer. Quality users like you are worth keeping!  : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seem to have taken it down. Perhaps they have seen the error of their ways. </p>
<p>@Possible Future Things User: I&#8217;m sure CC is really worried you might go elsewhere. Throwing a tantrum is definitely a good way to motivate a software developer. Quality users like you are worth keeping!  : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Potter</title>
		<link>http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html/comment-page-1#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/05/the-highest-form-of-flattery.html#comment-580</guid>
		<description>They just changed it.

They&#039;re new slogan is: &quot;Products from Web Developers for Web Developers.&quot;

The site is completely broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They just changed it.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re new slogan is: &#8220;Products from Web Developers for Web Developers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The site is completely broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

